Background
Stray light artifacts, particularly colorful “rainbow” ghosting effects, can severely degrade the user experience in near-eye displays and advanced imaging systems. However, “bad” stray light is notoriously difficult to quantify.
The Challenge
Engineering teams often rely on subjective visual inspection to evaluate stray light. One engineer might score a lens a “fail” while another scores it a “pass”. The lack of objective, repeatable metrics makes it difficult to track design improvements or set clear manufacturing tolerances.
The Approach
We developed a custom image-processing workflow to turn subjective perception into objective data:
- Image Segmentation: We implemented algorithms to isolate specific stray light artifacts from the background image data.
- Morphological Analysis: We analyzed the shape, size, and intensity distribution of the isolated artifacts.
- Perceptual Weighting: Crucially, we applied weighting functions that penalize artifacts based on their location in the field of view and their color contrast against the background, mimicking human visual perception.
- Automated Reporting: We built tools to automatically generate standardized reports for every tested lens.
The Outcome
This framework replaces subjective arguments with objective, repeatable data. Engineering teams can directly compare the stray light performance of different optical designs, and quality assurance processes can establish clear, data-driven pass/fail criteria.